Backlink profile
An examination of Spider Juice Technologies backlinks, repeated client-site footer credits, and the limits of shared-hosting evidence.
One realtor’s site, run from the same account.
1,171 of Spider Juice’s 1,671 backlinks come from a single domain, beachcitiesonline.com — a South Bay realtor’s site that carries the footer credit Carol Gilles Realtor · A Spider Juice Technologies project on every page. Public registration, DNS and hosting records show how closely the two sites are tied.
| Signal | beachcitiesonline.com | spiderjuicetechnologies.com | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS zone admin (SOA) | tim@ascendedweb.com | tim@ascendedweb.com | Identical |
| Nameservers | ns27 / ns28.websitewelcome.com | ns27 / ns28.websitewelcome.com | Identical |
| Hosting IP | 192.185.163.19 | 192.185.163.213 | Same /24 block |
| Host | HostGator (Unified Layer) | HostGator (Unified Layer) | Same |
| Custom plugin | wp-sjt-schema v1.0.0 | — | “SJT” = Spider Juice Technologies |
| Registrar · privacy | GoDaddy · Domains By Proxy | GoDaddy · Domains By Proxy | Same |
| Registered | Jan 2002 | Apr 2003 | — |
| Stack | WordPress 7.1.2 · Divi | WordPress 7.1.2 · Divi | Same (weak signal) |
| Google Analytics | G-YDNCN5L9XT | G-MMFNSLHM5X | Different |
| Footer link | 1,171 pages · dofollow · to homepage | — | — |
Matching nameservers and SOA contacts are consistent with shared hosting or administration; they do not by themselves prove a common server or account. The custom wp-sjt-schema plugin shows Spider Juice installed its own code on the client’s site.
Separate Google Analytics properties and different author accounts: two distinct WordPress installs. Ascended Web, the domain in the SOA contact, is an OC & LA web-design firm (714 number, no named staff); whether its “tim” is Spider Juice’s founder or a reseller hosting both could not be confirmed. Spider Juice’s IP reverse-resolves to vertexmarketingagency.com, an unrelated pay-per-lead firm now on Cloudflare — a stale DNS entry, not a connection.
Sitewide footer links should not be interpreted as independent editorial endorsements. The available evidence does not establish how Google weights these particular links. Remove this one managed property and most of Spider Juice’s apparent link volume disappears. The practice is common for web designers and is not improper in itself — the point is that the profile is far thinner than its raw backlink count suggests.
Sources: WHOIS, live DNS (NS, A, SOA, SPF, PTR), TLS certificates, page source of both sites, DataForSEO backlink index — queried 22–23 September 2026.
Published by Unhinged SEO. Adapted from the supplied report dated September 22, 2026, with exhibits captured September 23. Findings describe that historical snapshot; rankings, reviews and websites can change. An independent, unsolicited case study, not a client engagement or an affiliation with Spider Juice Technologies.
Methodology, sources & limitations → · Related sites & profiles →